(Member/Blog)
         
 
Popular Searches
 
 
 
Yet Another Post (like Everyone Else) On Google Chrome OS
08-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee

The tech news that got everybody's attention today was Google's announcement of a new operating system called Google Chrome OS. Google is the 500-pound gorilla in the field of web applications and every single move they make is bound to generate a lot of excitement. Throughout the day major news outlets, tech blogs, Twitter - all were abuzz with discussions on Google Chrome OS.

You might have heard of Google's Chrome web browser. It's a new browser - under development right now - just like Mozilla Firefox or Internet Explorer. Chrome browser has been praised often for being faster than other browser in the market on multiple counts - such as rendering a page, executing Javascript code, etc. Google did use quite a few innovative concepts when developing this browser. That said, it can be a bit unstable at times; so if you're the kind who doesn't like experimenting with software then stick to Firefox or IE.

Google Chrome OS (not the browser) is based on the concept of having a minimal interface with every work being done using a web application. Want to create/edit documents? Use Google Docs. Want to edit a picture? Do it online. Chrome OS is definitely not a challenger to Windows XP / Vista / 7. It's an operating system restricted only to 'netbooks' - small-sized laptops such as the Asus Eee PC which are mainly used for browsing the Internet.

My thoughts on this news is that Chrome OS will be a big failure. Just because the devices on which it run are called 'netbooks' doesn't mean that they are always connected to the Internet. It doesn't mean that a web interface is the magical solution to every problem. It doesn't necessarily mean that it will be fast. Agreed that Chrome OS will start within seconds, but performance after that will be your-mileage-may-vary depending on how good your Internet connection is.

Say you want to listen to music. Is a web-based player the ideal solution for a situation like this? Definitely not. Or say you want to use your netbook to check some documents when you're travelling - on a train or a plane. You can't! Something as simple as thing will be impossible with Chrome OS. 24x7 net connectivity is all well and good if you're in a developed country. Simply walk into a Starbucks or roam around public places and you'll find Wi-Fi hotspots. But say someone comes over from there to...India. Now his netbook is nothing but an extremely expensive paperweight. And even then, connectivity issues can be a problem abroad too.

I know that some of you are going to bring up Google Gears now. Google Gears allows web applications to work in 'offline mode' and then synchronize it later with a web server. But then why bother making an OS which is a glorified browser running web apps and then create workarounds to make them work offline? Why not simply make a native lightweight operating system with option to sync with your stuff stored online when there's connectivity? Surely that makes more sense.

In order to provide a boot-up time in seconds, Google gave no thought to common sense. However, nobody has seen Chrome OS till now of course. We can only go by what Google has told us about it. RMS will be shitting bricks when Chrome OS comes out saying 'web applications aren't free enough' (they aren't). Time will tell how good it is and whether people bother to buy devices using this.

Let's throw that open as a question. Would you but a laptop on which you can work only if you're connected to the Internet, but can start up within seconds? Leave your two cents below on this topic.

Add To Favorite Flag as inappropriate Post Rating
Rating: 1.7 from 10 vote(s) cast.
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend Post Your Comment 
Comments
08-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee
@Shantanu: I agree it's early days yet. Still, the idea of a web-based OS is ridiculous. I'm only discussing what they have announced till now.

@Anirudh: Anytime anywhere connectivity is still a dream even in the US. And what about server downtime, like it happened with Gmail? I don't think people will have much patience for issues like that for basic tasks.

@Ravi: Chrome OS won't even remotely pose a threat, but yes, it does seem the main motive behind this is sabre-rattling at Microsoft.
08-07-2009 | Anirudh Garg
@Ravi
I totally agree that boot time is no reason for Chrome OS to sell.
Anyone would happily go with an OS that works better than with an OS that opens up 10 seconds (or as a matter of fact even 2 min) faster.

If they keep this as their selling point, it will be,as you say, totally amateur.
But it doesnt seem to be that Google would do something THAT dumb. Selling baseless products purely on their own name would be very unprofessional and HIGHLY unexpected of them....


@Ankur

Hmm..
True..
I was thinking about failing servers too earlier....
But as I said, its just probably the right thing in the wrong time. Universal connectivity isn't just there right now.
08-07-2009 | Ankur Goel
@ankurb but as you said in beginning, "so if you're the kind who doesn't like experimenting with software then stick to ....", I think that this OS need to be tried anyhow (though I know you will be the first to review it :) )
Even I didn't like the idea of waiting for net for web - based applications 24*7
08-07-2009 | Amused
Jeez, reading comprehension is not your strong point is it?

"Google Chrome OS... will initially be targeted at netbooks"

"...a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel"

What are you? 12? You're trying too hard to sound authoritative and knowledgeable about tech.
08-07-2009 | Shantanu
I think it is too early to make any sort of judgement calls without taking a look at even an alpha of what they are doing..
08-07-2009 | Anirudh Garg
I don't really think that it will be a failure on the part of application.
Its rather an interesting idea to run an OS on web-based open source applications.
It seems like something that would click. I don't know if it will be good enough to make people leave Windows or Mac, but it definitely will attract a big amount of crowd.

But I'll agree its true that web won't be accessible everywhere..
But to think of it..if with time web DOES become universally accessible (1 day it ultimately will obviously)..Chrome OS surely seems fit for then..
It will definitely work to listen to songs on the net at that time..
Probably you can say that Chrome OS is the right OS in the wrong time.


And honestly I believe Google will do more than to cut down booting seconds.

At some level, they haven't given proper details yet, so lets see..
08-07-2009 | Ravi Punj
I do agree with Shantanu that it is a little too early to say how Google goes about everything.

I also agree with Anirudh that whatever comes out will attract a lot of attention. But only because it's google.

Other than that, I agree with Ankur. It's gonna be a big fail. Google was doing a good job of integrating the Web with the Desktop, but building an OS as an *extension* to the web browser.

Another thing which comes to my mind is how Microsoft was convicted of unfair practices when it shipped IE as the standard browser in Windows. Wouldn't there be similar complications with Chrome OS.

The Google Blog really stressed upon boot time, which according to me is totally over-hyped. Even Fedora 11 will have a 20-second boot time. I don't see me dropping it for an 18-second boot time, because after a point it just-doesn't-matter.

I really think it's a very stupid and Microsoft-ish move by Google. Amateur at best.
09-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee
@Amused: It's interesting that you bring up those points. You act as if you're quoting text from the article and then go on to act as a smart alec - when in reality those words are first mentioned only in your comment. What are *you* - a fucking retard who thinks up imaginary words on-the-fly to insert in an article?
09-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee
@Ankur Goel: I'm sure a lot of non tech-savvy users will be ready to experiment with Chrome OS too, just because Google's name is associated with this project.
09-07-2009 | Amused
Thanks for proving me right.

I quoted from the Google blog post, kid.
09-07-2009 | Dhruv Khurana
There's a good chance that it will be a failure and there's another OS being made for netbooks based on Linux like Android using ARM tech but that means 2 OS's from Google or are they the same???
09-07-2009 | Dhruv Khurana
There\\
09-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee
@Amusing: If you had cared not to snip out text, then you might have noticed it said "The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel." The main point here being 'Google Chrome' and not 'new windowing system'. It's not the new windowing system which is important but the idea that people access web apps via a browser. Maybe they'll make a new one - but they can already use Fluxbox or Xfce.
09-07-2009 | Ankur Banerjee
@Dhruv Khurana: Android and Chrome OS are completely different. There _were_ rumors that Google might consider approaching hardware partners to run Android on netbooks. Seem to have taken a different direction now with two separate ideas being tested. I assume they didn't want Android to get unwieldy handling too many different types of devices since it's primarily intended for smartphones.
10-07-2009 | Anuj
I agree.
10-07-2009 | Akhil
I guess everybody agrees with this that Google's OS wouldn't be much of a hit.
 
Post Your Comment
 Your name: *  
 Email: *  
 Comment: *  
 Characters Remaining
 Verification Code: *
 
 
 
members area
 
 
forgotten password?
Register Now! Join Youthpad
 
Poll
Do you think Apple iPAD will pose a serious threat to Kindle?
Yes No
Can't Say Don't Care
   
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 


An amazing website with focus on FREEDOM.. and above all its an initiative by a youth, for the youth and of youth.
Tarun M
 Click here to have your say about Youthpad.


Copyright © : 2009 Youthpad.com. All Rights Reserved.